Conversation

Notices

  1. cabal cabal

    The Cabal has arrived.

    Monday, 04-Apr-11 23:23:56 UTC from web
    1. Techdisk Techdisk

      @pegasusjones stop taking the G.O.A.T.

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:17:16 UTC from web
      1. Ross (FlamingPandaOMG) Ross (FlamingPandaOMG)

        @techdisk Haha, FO3 reference.

        Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:18:10 UTC from web
        1. Tyler Suter Tyler Suter

          @flamingpandaomg what is FO3?

          Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:18:26 UTC from web
          1. Ross (FlamingPandaOMG) Ross (FlamingPandaOMG)

            @twistedspectre Fallout 3.

            Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:18:46 UTC from web
    2. Techdisk Techdisk

      @pegasusjones answer --> @flamingpandaomg

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:18:52 UTC from web
      1. Tyler Suter Tyler Suter

        @techdisk @nerthos Well, we each have our own tastes, like I like Sauerkraut.

        Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:19:14 UTC from web
      2. Tyler Suter Tyler Suter

        @techdisk Didn't mean to tag you

        Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:19:34 UTC from web
    3. RDN's Lucifer RDN's Lucifer

      @pegasusjones Lots of job opportunities in exotic lands like North Korea!

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:19:05 UTC from web
    4. RDN's Lucifer RDN's Lucifer

      @pegasusjones Think of the benefits. Infinite budget, a really long title, cool uniform, and being able to play basketball with Kim Jong Un.

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:25:37 UTC from web
    5. RDN's Lucifer RDN's Lucifer

      @pegasusjones The people is poor. That doesn't mean the goverment doesn't squeeze every last penny out of everyone.

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:27:59 UTC from web
    6. RDN's Lucifer RDN's Lucifer

      @pegasusjones Well '50s tech is cool

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:30:03 UTC from web
    7. RDN's Lucifer RDN's Lucifer

      @pegasusjones Then again, the cost of attacking them greatly outweights any benefit from doing so, vouching for the effectiveness of all that outdated conventional arms. '50s guns are actually far more powerful than today's guns, since at the time the idea was to kill soldiers, not to wound them to make the enemy waste resources.

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:33:50 UTC from web
    8. RDN's Lucifer RDN's Lucifer

      @pegasusjones Just to fight a war of attrition against an army of over 9 million indoctrinated soldiers, that would take at least a decade to crush. Not to mention China has no intention of letting any rival world power attack and get an outpost that cclose to them.

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:39:05 UTC from web
    9. RDN's Lucifer RDN's Lucifer

      @pegasusjones As I said, a decade long war of attrition. A humongous cost in soldiers and supplies to both sides regardless of technology and winner.

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:43:07 UTC from web
    10. RDN's Lucifer RDN's Lucifer

      @pegasusjones http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/04/10/graphic-north-koreas-conventional-arms/

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:50:05 UTC from web
    11. RDN's Lucifer RDN's Lucifer

      @pegasusjones They have some nice things they bought over the years. But still, there has been many cases of inferiorly equipped forces with really good tactics and strategy being able to fend off supposedly superior enemies.

      Thursday, 18-Jul-13 04:56:52 UTC from web